<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Research on Sign and Shadow</title>
    <link>https://signandshadow.com/tags/research/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Research on Sign and Shadow</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <managingEditor>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026 Tommy Keene</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://signandshadow.com/tags/research/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Confessionalism Promotes Academic Integrity</title>
      <link>https://signandshadow.com/2023/10/24/confessionalism-promotes-academic-integrity/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</author>
      <guid>https://signandshadow.com/2023/10/24/confessionalism-promotes-academic-integrity/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;The WordPress &amp;ldquo;Headline Analyzer&amp;rdquo; algorithm has determined that my title is not all that provocative or interesting, scoring a mere 22/100. When I re-titled it &amp;ldquo;top ten reasons why confessional institutions are better than the &amp;lsquo;free academy&amp;rsquo;&amp;rdquo; it scored 84/100; however, because I&amp;rsquo;m a responsible academician and refuse to cave to click-bate, I&amp;rsquo;m sticking with the original and more boring (and accurate) title.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>How to Write a Seminary Paper, Part 4: Research as Conversation</title>
      <link>https://signandshadow.com/2022/10/13/how-to-write-a-seminary-paper-part-4-research-as-conversation/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2022 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</author>
      <guid>https://signandshadow.com/2022/10/13/how-to-write-a-seminary-paper-part-4-research-as-conversation/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;You&amp;rsquo;ve got a &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.signandshadow.com/2017/11/02/how-to-write-a-seminary-paper-part-1-the-thesis/&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;thesis&lt;/a&gt; (or hypothesis), which is the most important thing. You&amp;rsquo;ve also &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.signandshadow.com/2017/11/20/how-to-write-a-seminary-paper-part-2-researching-your-thesis/&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;started your research&lt;/a&gt;. Then it all gets a bit overwhelming. There&amp;rsquo;s &lt;em&gt;so much&lt;/em&gt; to read, so many issues to discuss, and it often feels like you&amp;rsquo;ve got so little to contribute. Once you start to your research you realize that the issue isn&amp;rsquo;t &amp;ldquo;where to begin?&amp;rdquo; but rather &amp;ldquo;when will it all end?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
    <item>
      <title>How to Write a Seminary Paper: Part 2, Researching (And Perfecting) Your Thesis</title>
      <link>https://signandshadow.com/2017/11/20/how-to-write-a-seminary-paper-part-2-researching-and-perfecting-your-thesis/</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</author>
      <guid>https://signandshadow.com/2017/11/20/how-to-write-a-seminary-paper-part-2-researching-and-perfecting-your-thesis/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;figure&gt;&lt;img&#xA;    class=&#34;my-0 rounded-md&#34;&#xA;    loading=&#34;lazy&#34;&#xA;    decoding=&#34;async&#34;&#xA;    fetchpriority=&#34;low&#34;&#xA;    alt=&#34;&#34;&#xA;    src=&#34;https://signandshadow.com/images/20161227-untitled-0126-300x200.jpg&#34;&#xA;    &gt;&lt;/figure&gt;&#xA;In our first post we looked at the most &lt;a href=&#34;http://www.signandshadow.com/2017/11/02/how-to-write-a-seminary-paper-part-1-the-thesis/&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;important aspect of a good seminary paper: the thesis.&lt;/a&gt; But the thesis is actually only one leg of a three legged school. A good seminary paper (or any paper, sermon, public speech, or argument, for that matter) contains three components: (1) a good question, (2) a good answer, and (3) a good argument.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
