<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Messiah on Sign and Shadow</title>
    <link>https://signandshadow.com/tags/messiah/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Messiah on Sign and Shadow</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <managingEditor>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026 Tommy Keene</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://signandshadow.com/tags/messiah/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Is the NT Reliable? Part 4: Historiography</title>
      <link>https://signandshadow.com/2024/03/07/is-the-nt-reliable-part-4-historiography/</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Mar 2024 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</author>
      <guid>https://signandshadow.com/2024/03/07/is-the-nt-reliable-part-4-historiography/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;What follows is a continuation of a talk I gave at &lt;a href=&#34;https://rts.edu/calendar/sed-contra-is-the-new-testament-reliable/&#34;  target=&#34;_blank&#34; rel=&#34;noreferrer&#34;&gt;RTS Washington’s &lt;em&gt;Sed Contra&lt;/em&gt; series&lt;/a&gt;. The series of is intended to be a casual space for conversation about difficult or controversial topics. Since I decided to write up my presentation “conference style,” I thought I’d chop it up into bits and post it on the blog. Here’s part 4 (and links for the other parts should appear above).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
