<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Biblical-Theology on Sign and Shadow</title>
    <link>https://signandshadow.com/tags/biblical-theology/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Biblical-Theology on Sign and Shadow</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <managingEditor>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</webMaster>
    <copyright>© 2026 Tommy Keene</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://signandshadow.com/tags/biblical-theology/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    
    <item>
      <title>Paul&#39;s Theology is His History</title>
      <link>https://signandshadow.com/2017/01/14/pauls-theology-is-his-history/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <author>tommy@signandshadow.com (Tommy Keene)</author>
      <guid>https://signandshadow.com/2017/01/14/pauls-theology-is-his-history/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Wrede brought an end to 19th century liberalism by famously demonstrating that Paul&amp;rsquo;s religion is his theology. The liberals wanted to seperate the two&amp;ndash;the modern Christian can and should extract Paul&amp;rsquo;s Christ mysticism and ethic of love from Paul&amp;rsquo;s outdated ideas about a retributive God and coming judgement. Wrede rightly pointed out that this attempt to remove some pure religious fruit (ethics) while discarding such an unpalatable theological husk (judgement) was no longer tenable. Paul&amp;rsquo;s religious practice is grounded in his theological dogma; the two are welded together, permanently indisoluble.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      
    </item>
    
  </channel>
</rss>
